http://www.fourwinds10.net 2013-06-18T15:10:22+01:00 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1371308403 June 14, 2013 But Supremes bash back with new set of 'regulations' A federal judge has blasted the Supreme Court’s plaza policy, which forbids people from being in “assemblages” or carrying signs that are intended to attract attention, declaring such limits in the shadow of the building where the First Amendment is supposed to be protected unconstitutional. With hours, the Supremes bashed back, installing a new set of restrictive “regulations” specifying what can and cannot happen on the high court property including the plaza. It was Judge Beryl Howell who wrote in an opinion this week that such limits – outlined in federal law and based on the “dignity” of the location – are unconstitutional and unenforceable. “The absolute prohibition of expressive activity in the statute is unreasonable, substantially overbroad, and irreconcilable with the First Amendment,” the judge wrote. “The court therefore must find the statute unconstitutional and void as applied to the Supreme Court plaza. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1371222063 June 14, 2013 (NaturalNews) The disdain many of our "Old Guard" elected leaders have for the very Constitution to which they have sworn an oath to observe and uphold is routinely on display these days, perhaps because We the People have, for far too long, neglected to hold them accountable for their miscreant deeds. This dismissive attitude reared its ugly head once again recently when top Senate Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina suggested that Americans who blog aren't really reporting in the traditional sense, and as such may not be entitled to First Amendment protections. In responding to a reporter's question about so-called "media shield legislation" under consideration in Congress following the disclosure that the Obama Justice Department improperly obtained telephone records of Associated Press and Fox News reporters and editors, Graham had this to say: "'Who is a journalist' is a question we need to ask ourselves. Is any blogger out there saying anything - do they deserve First Amendment protection? These are the issues of our times."   'Are you planning to fire Holder?' The "issues of our times?" Since when has the First Amendment been subject to congressional approval, senator? Then again, this whole thing begs the larger question: Why the need for a "media shield law" at all, given that the First Amendment already guarantees freedom of the press? The National Journal had this to say on Graham's "riffing" on the Bill of Rights: Graham's riffing on constitutional law exposes one of the age-old tensions between journalism as a product and journalism as an activity. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1370967724 June 11, 2013 Instead of focusing the attention on what the NSA, and IRS have been doing from the beginning of their respective formation(s), "thus the reason for them having been created to start with", more light should be shed on the question of whether or not either one of these agencies were ever authorized under the US Constitution to be created in the first place. Then, after having completed  a line by line, comprehensive examination of the US Constitution, and presumably finding no Constitutional Authority for the existence of either the NSA or IRS; the only question should be -- "by what legislative authority were the IRS and NSA created, and if there wasn't any -- then both agencies should be shut down immediately, along with the three main branches of government, "and remain shut down", until the process of identifying  all extra constitutional usurpation's since just before the Civil War has been completed, and the result of those usurpation's dissolved, leaving only those governmental services specifically authorized under the US Constitution, and the reinstatement of the original Republic.   rremelin@gmail.com text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1370963075 June 11, 2013 Back in December 2007, before he was US President, Senator Barack Obama joined Senator Chris Dodd in threatening to filibuster the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Obama opposed provisions granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies which shared private client information with the government. At that time Obama's office issued this statement: "Granting such immunity undermines the constitutional protections Americans trust the Congress to protect. Senator Obama supports a filibuster of this bill …." A year later, in February 2008, supporting an amendment which he believed repealed retroactive immunity from FISA, Obama said: "We can give our intelligence and law enforcement community the powers they need to track down and take out terrorists without undermining our commitment to the rule of law, or our basic rights and liberties. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1370442772 FW:  June 5, 2013 INTRODUCTION: 80% of Americans today are too illiterate to understand The Declaration of Independence, but even if they could , they would not believe it had anything to do with America, or with them, so why bother reading it. The Jews have done a masterful job with their Frankenstein Monster called 'Public Education', guaranteeing that plummeting literacy and comprehension would become the mainstay of American culture. I am all for education -- but not if it interferes with your ability to think and reason -- which is what the Heebs have done to the Goyim over the last 150 years; that is, interrupt their ability to think-things-through,  by jamming their thoughts with pure nonsense, and lies.  ---- Rod Remelin ******************* THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE In Congress, July 4, 1776, THE UNANIMOUS DECLARATION OF THE THIRTEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1370012016 Published on May 26, 2013 As above VIEW HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf5YxhH5CZY&feature=youtu.be text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1369964817 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1369963377 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1369322499 April 16, 2013 DontWakeMeUp.Org Launched As Civil Rights Lawsuit Proceeds Against Texas Troopers Trooper facing civil suit denies threatening motorist with arrest, despite being recorded UPDATE 4/16/13 2PM PACIFIC: WOKEN UP AGAIN! The irony of, on the very day I launch my new website DontWakMeUp.Org, it happens. Again. Today. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1369319525 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1369272721 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1369188002 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1368724199 May 16, 2013 http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdf Reposted in light of the current IRS scandal. This is the transcript of the court case, referred to my Aaron Russo in "AMERICA: FROM FREEDOM TO FASCISM" in which the judge of the case admitted on the court record that the 16th Amendment, on which the legality of the personal income tax supposedly rests, in fact failed ratification. In this post-Saddam's nukes world, the idea that the US Government lied to the people to impose a tax for the bankers (the 16th Amendment and the Federal Reserve Act were passed in the same year) is not as unthinkable as it once was. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1368637963 May 13, 2013 VIEW HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfVmzZ2zsO0&feature=youtu.be text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1368235869 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1368153960 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1367687118 May 2, 2013 CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS FOR THE IMPEACHMENT AND FRAUD UPON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, ET AL. 1. IMPROPER FAILURE TO REPORT, 2. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1366216005 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1364993105 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1363620680 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1362593660 FW:  March 6, 2013 February 28, 2013 Tuesday’s ruling pitches the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure into the dustbin of history. Photo: Library of Congress. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court disemboweled the Fourth Amendment. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that citizens cannot challenge government wiretapping laws, in particular the unconstitutional Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and, more recently, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. According to Justice Samuel Alito, millions of Americans can no longer expect the government to uphold the Constitution and prevent the NSA from conducting dragnet surveillance. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1362422996 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1362235491 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1362056318 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1361032183 Feb. 15, 2013 It came out a couple of weeks ago: the executive summary of a report issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called, "Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Impact Assessment: Border Searches of Electronic Devices." Basically, the DHS was charged with the responsibility of determining whether or not its policy of seizing laptops and cell phones from travelers is a violation of both civil and constitutional rights. Any moderately-educated American could answer that question quite simply — but no, we had to spend a few more tax dollars for the government to figure that one out. And you'll never guess what the DHS concluded. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1360118659 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1358441452 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1358265303 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:23 PM, <USMCdaughter> wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate#By_country   Ref. Switzerland having the lowest homicide rate: actually Austria, Bahrain, Brunei, Hong Kong, Iceland, Guam, Japan, Polynesia, Singapore and Samoa are lower but all are under 1.0. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1358009335 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1358008728 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1357748440 Jan. 9, 2013 Basic American Civics 101 In 1789, our Founding Fathers gave America a Constitutional Republic Because of them, Americans were born free.  However, because we have lost sight of basic truths,we could very shortly lose  our Republic and become enslaved in  tyranny.   At one time, these principles of government and basic truths were taught in every school.  By age 10, every child clearly understood these principles and truths. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1357405593 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1357314451 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1357221978 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1356977675 Dec. 30, 2012 WASHINGTON – A state lawmaker in Montana is proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution to deal with the suggestion from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1356364159 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1355853867 Dec. 18, 2012 (NaturalNews) America is a Republic, not a Democracy. And in a Republic, individual liberties are protected by the Bill of Rights, even against majority opinion. Just because a majority of citizens, for example, can be emotionally manipulated into trying to take away the right to bear arms, for example, doesn't mean they can override the Bill of Rights. No President has any power over the Bill of Rights. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1355586937 Dec 11, 2012 Ben Swann takes a look at claims by a Florida State Senator and what he thinks of those who believe in nullification VIEW VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlpVJC4Phlg&feature=youtu.be text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1355362552 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1354386714 FW:  Dec. 1, 2012 Most of the constitutional debates in which I participate are about whether to comply strictly with the Constitution as originally meant and understood, or with court precedents even their defenders admit have drifted far from original meaning, or even with disregard for the Constitution altogether as a relic that is no longer relevant to solving modern problems. The second most common thread is among those who would like to be able to strictly comply with the Constitution as originally meant, but lament that so many seem bent on not doing so that they represent a political force that is difficult for the constitutional loyalists to overcome. Most of those see the problem not as a deficiency in the Constitution but as a decline in civic virtue, and wonder how that decline might be reversed. Some see a problem arising from the evolution of legal English, such that the language of the Constitution, written in the legal English of 1787, is no longer readily accessible to modern users of the language, suggesting either the need for translation or amendments to clarify the language for moderns. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1354128297 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1351615027 Oct. 27, 2012 The government has been at war with the people in the states since the contract of 1787, and the Judiciary Act of 1789 were set in place. The Judiciary Act set up the 'districts' for martial law proper, and placed the marshals in charge to carry out orders under direction of the generals... text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1351269552 Oct. 26, 2012 Changing 'Fundamental Law' in America:     First lesson:  The preamble (shown left), was an American invention.  No, not us interlopers from Europe.  It is an Iroquois quote from The Great Law of Peace, the six-nation confederacy of the Iroquois nations.  And in case you are wondering, it didn't work out any better for them than it did for our founders. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1351182462 Oct. 25, 2012 VIEW HERE http://powervideotube.com/watch_video.php?v=99X4A41DB71O http://blip.tv/the-unhived-mind/the-u-s-president-is-not-the-commander-in-chief-6046809 http://vimeo. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1348684101 "Congress shall make no law that applies to the  citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to all members of  Congress, Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law  that applies to all members of Congress, Senators and/or Representatives that  does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.   ---- From DT text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1348571845 Sept. 24, 2012 America was founded on a conspiracy theory: that Britain’s King George and his men were conspiring against the colonists. The Declaration of Independence recites a series of conspiracies: When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism … The history of the present King of Great Britain [and others working with and for him] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. *** He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1346259784 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1345051103 Aug. 13, 2012 http://lewrockwell.com/barnett/barnett53.1.html       The constitution granted the government the power to administrate and carry on Corporate functions. text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1342026753 text/html 1970-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 http://www.fourwinds10.net http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1340464276 FW 6/23/12 1994 Between 1787 and 1791 the Framers of the U.S. Constitution established a system of government upon principles that had been discussed and partially implemented in many countries over the course of several centuries, but never before in such a pure and complete design, which we call a constitutional republic. Since then, the design has often been imitated, but important principles have often been ignored in those imitations, with the result that their governments fall short of being true republics or truly constitutional. Although these principles are discussed in civics books, the treatment of them there is often less than satisfactory.