HATONN: HALLEY'S COMET AND FRIENDS: MESSENGERS OF THE GENESIS EVENT
CREATOR GOD ATON/HATONN
Ah, you expected me to speak of "people" who were sent as messengers? People are most unstable and forgetful, chelas--[neither] God nor Creation would entrust the signs and messages of unchangeable magnitude into the hands of humans. In higher wisdom HE will always send messengers which cannot be cajoled, bribed or tampered with.
Of what am I speaking? Example: In 1986 Mankind was given (evolved in proper sequence) a once-in-a-lifetime event" the appearance of a messenger from the past, a Messenger of Genesis. It was a comet which had been spoken of since Genesis. However, in your latter accounting you decided to label it Halley's Comet. But I remind you--a rose by any other name is but a rose!
Halley's Comet is unique in many ways as it differs from the many comets and other small objects that roam the heavens. Among the differences is the fact that its recorded appearances have been traced to millennia past, as well as the fact that modern science was able, in 1986, to conduct for the first time a comprehensive, close-up examination of a comet and its core--or so it was claimed. The first fact underscores the excellence of ancient astronomy; because of the second, data was obtained that once again corroborated ancient knowledge and the tales of Genesis.
In 1720 Edmund Halley became British Astronomer Royal. He had postulated that the comet he observed in 1682 (and which came to bear his name) was a periodic one, the same that had been observed in 1531 and 1607. There was a chain of scientific developments which led to this--during the years 1695-1705. This involved the promulgation of the laws of gravitation and celestial motion by Sir Isaac Newton and Newton's consulting with Halley about his findings. By the way, it would seem worthy to again remind you that Esu (Jesus) Emmanuel was NOT born on December 25 but Isaac Newton WAS. Perhaps that would be a most worthy celebration and stop quarrels over Jesus and stars of David, and candlesticks.
Until this time in point the theory regarding comets was that they crossed the heavens in straight lines, appearing at one end of the skies and disappearing in the other direction, never to be seen again. BUT, based on Newtonian laws, Halley concluded that the curve expressed by comets is elliptical, eventually bringing these celestial bodies back to where they had been observed before. The "three" comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682 were unusual in that they were all orbiting in the "wrong" direction--clockwise rather than counterclockwise; had similar deviations from the general orbital plane of the planets around the Sun--being inclined about 17-18 degrees--and were similar in appearance. Concluding they were one and the same comet, he plotted its course and calculated its period (the length of time between its appearances) to be about seventy-six years. He did not live long enough to see his prediction come true, but he was honored by having the comet named after him.
SUN ENLIVENS COMETS
Like that of all celestial bodies, and especially because of a comet's small size, its orbit is easily perturbed by gravitational pull of the planets it passes. This is especially true of Jupiter's effect. Each time a comet nears the Sun, its frozen material comes to life; the comet develops a head and a very long tail, and begins to lose some of its material as it turns to gas and vapor. This is an assumption based upon the best information which can be gleaned on your place. It is close enough to serve the purposes herein. All these phenomena affect the comet's orbit; therefore, although more precise measurements have somewhat narrowed the orbital range of Halley's comet from the seventy-four to seventy-nine years that he had calculated, the period of seventy-six years is only a practical average; the actual orbit and its period must be recalculated each time the comet makes an appearance.
With the aid of equipment now available to you, an average of six or so comets are reported each year; of them, one or two are comets on return trips, while others are newly discovered. This does NOT mean they are not on return trips--only that they had not been discovered. Most of the recognized "returning" comets are short-period ones, the shortest known being that of Encke's comet, which nears the Sun and then returns to a region slightly beyond the asteroid belt (I will momentarily speak about that asteroid belt in relationship to what is coming down TODAY on your planet) in a period of a little more than three years. Most short-period comets average an orbital period of about seven years, which carries them to the environs of Jupiter. Typical of them is comet Giacobini-Zinner (named, like other comets, after its discoverers), which has a period of 6-1/2 years; its latest passage within Earth's view was in 1985. On the other hand there are very-long-period comets like comet Kohoutek, which was discovered in March 1973, was fully visible in December 1973 and January 1974, and then disappeared from view, perhaps to return in 75,000 years. By comparison, the cycle of 76 years for Halley's Comet is short enough to remain in living memories, yet long enough to retain its magic as a once-in-a-lifetime celestial event.
When Halley's comet appeared on its next-to-last passage around the Sun, in 1910, its course and aspects had been well mapped out in advance. Still, the Great Comet of 1910, as it was called, was awaited with great apprehension. There was fear that Earth or life on it would not survive the anticipated passage because Earth would be enveloped in the comet's tail of poisonous gases. There was also alarm at the prospect that, as was believed in earlier times, the appearance of the comet would be an ill omen of pestilence, wars, and death of kings. As the comet reached its greatest magnitude and brilliance in May of 1910, its tail stretching over more than half the vault of heaven, King Edward VII of Great Britain died. On the European continent, a series of political upheavals culminated in the outbreak of World War I in 1914. You see, the politicians already knew how to utilize your "mystical aspects" to their own cause.
The belief, or superstition, associating Halley's Comet with wars and upheavals was fed by much that was coming to light about events that coincided with its previous appearances. The Seminole Indians' revolt against the white settlers of Florida in 1835, the Great Lisbon Earthquake of 1755, the outbreak of the Thirty Years' War in 1618, the Turkish siege of Belgrade in 1456, the outbreak of the Black Death, (bubonic plague) in 1347--all were accompanied or preceded by the appearance of a great comet, which was finally recognized as Halley's Comet, thus establishing its role as the messenger of God's wrath.
NOSTRADAMUS--SEPTEMBER, NOT MAY
How interesting to note that still it is efforted to attach Nostradamus' projections onto Halley's Comet--when it is totally obvious that it cannot be Halley's Comet of which he spoke. If I were you I would look a bit further to that "BIG" one and begin to pay more attention to "September" rather then May and back it off about 9 years.
ASTEROID BOMBARDMENT EXPECTED
I wish to herein refer to the asteroid belt as already expected to affect Earth and has the politicians running nuts in total fright. THEY KNOW YOU ARE APT TO BE HIT, AND POSSIBLY DESTROYED, by things from the "asteroid belt". This is what SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) is about, chelas.
Your President Reagan gave it away in a massive slip of the lip. He suggested that you had better team up with all your enemies AGAINST INVASION FROM SPACE. The massive amounts of money spent was for a comprehensive satellite system to hook up the globe to computer monitoring systems to nail every man, woman and child into the system--FOR THE BANKERS' ELITE.
The "STAR WARS" portion was to set up a defense system, not against Soviet missiles, but to hopefully be able to blast oncoming asteroids before they could reach Earth.
So what else is new? You can't seem to believe most things I tell you until you get confirmation from some author or "inside reporter" on your terra-firma. So be it--you WILL get it, I promise you that much. Why don't you read the paper and watch the news? Even though you don't get any truth, the lies are sprinkled with truth if you know that for which to watch.
NASA continues to announce in the major news media and in scientific journals (which I doubt you-the-people access) that there is a probability of large meteors or asteroids striking the Earth with calamitous results. They have even suggested some possible dates of impact.
NASA has, further, stated that "It was a good thing that Ronald Reagan had the perception and foresight to build up the Strategic Defense Initiative--"Star Wars"--because now SDI can be used to destroy these asteroids before they strike the Earth." This is partially incorrect for SDI was NEVER intended to be an anti-missile defense system. If anything, it was intended to be an "asteroid defense system". (This according to your own "scientists"!) The telescopes that "were not launched" but retained in White Sands, are now launched and working just fine--they are covering possible asteroid invasion. This is just another ploy to NOT tell you what the governments are doing--all of them in conjunction via their Elite coalitions and Security Councils in secret meetings with secret agendas hidden under things such as "National Security" and "Executive Privilege".
The "Communist Threat" and the "Soviet Nuclear Attack" as have been presented for your consumption, was a pretty sick joke on the people of the world. These were fabricated to keep you working hard and paying taxes to finance the "New World Order". The Soviet "War Machine" has been financed and subsidized by the American taxpayer since 1917 through such organizations as "The American International Corporation" on whose board of directors sat George Herbert Walker, the grandfather of George Herbert Walker Bush. This has been known for YEARS, chelas--ask Eustace Mullins--he wrote all about it in his book THE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
I think you must become aware that, in addition to the major underground facilities in the United States which I presented to you, there are at least 50 new ones which I am reminded to mention to you.
One of the major ones I saved to speak about at a later date (and will still reserve for a bit longer) is one well known in San Luis Obispo County, California. It is the AT&T Pacific Long Lines Facility off a road recognized as Low Osos Valley Road. I only give this as identification for ones who would recognize the location. The we-the-people would NEVER be allowed entry for this one is a major "Elite" refuge and belongs to one of the most massive factions in your Global conspiracy. Since the touting is all toward "peace" and no more threat from the Soviets --it means that there is full expectation of massive asteroid blasts. This means that there must be heavy construction at depths deeper even than for atomic bomb protection.
...By the way, this specific installation belongs to "The Gehlen Organization" and is called "Eagles Nest". This information is right out of California Specialized Training Institute files. By the way, call a law firm by the label of Sinsheimer, Schiegelhut, and Bagett in San Luis Obispo and maybe you can make your reservation --if you live in the area --for everyone should be prepared! Oh, by the way No. 2: Judge William P. Clark and Mrs. Clark (Von Braun), are major VIP's in charge --you know, THE Clark that was behind the bombing fiasco of flight KAL.OO7! Chelas, you simply MUST get with this program!
HALLEY'S COMET DIVINELY ORDAINED?
Well, it doesn't matter, the coincidence of the comet's appearance in conjunction with major historic events seems to grow the more you go back in time. One of the most celebrated appearances of a comet, definitely Halley's, is that of 1066, during the Battle of Hastings in which the Saxons, under King Harold, were defeated by William the Conqueror. The comet was depicted on the famous Bayeux tapestry, which is thought to have been commissioned by Queen Matilda, wife of William the Conqueror, to illustrate his victory. The inscription next to the comet's tail, Isti mirant stella, means, "They are in awe of the star", and refers to the depiction of King Harold tottering on his throne.
The year 66 A.D. is considered by astronomers to be one in which Halley's Comet made an appearance; they base conclusions on at least two Chinese observations. That was the year in which the Jews of Judea launched their Great Revolt against Rome. The Jewish historian Josephus (Wars of the Jews, Book VI) blamed the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of its holy Temple on the misinterpretation by the Jews of the heavenly signs and preceded the revolt: "a star resembling a sword which stood over the city, a comet that continued a whole year".
Until recently the earliest certain record of the observation of a comet was found in the Chinese Chronological Tables of Shih-chi for the year 467 B.C., in which the pertinent entry reads, "During the tenth year of CH'in Li-kung a broomstar was seen. Modern astronomers are not sure that the 467 B.C. Shih-chi entry refers to Halley's Comet; they are more confident regarding a Shih-chi entry for the year 240 B.C.
In April 1985, F.R. Stephenson, K.K.C. Yau, and H. Hunger reported that a reexamination of Babylonian astronomical tablets that had been lying in the basement of the British Museum since their discovery in Mesopotamia more than a century ago, shows that the tablets recorded the appearance of extraordinary celestial bodies --probably comets, they said-- in the years 164 B.C. and 87 B.C. The periodicity of seventy-seven years suggested to these scholars that the unusual celestial bodies were Halley's Comet.
Surely back in the year 164 B.C. and 87 B.C. these scholars who have been preoccupied with Halley's Comet could not have realized the significance of Jewish and Near Eastern history, of such events. It was the very year in which the Jews of Judea, under the leadership of the Maccabees, revolted against Greek-Syrian domination, recaptured Jerusalem, and purified the defiled Temple according to their traditions. The Temple rededication ceremony is celebrated to this day by Jews as the festival of ("Rededication").
The 164 B.C. tablet number WA-41462 in the British Museum is clearly dated to the relevant year in the reign of the Seleucid (Greek-Syrian) king Antiochus Epiphanes, the very evil King Antiochus of the books of Maccabees. The unusual celestial object, which the three scholars believe was Halley's Comet, is reported to have been seen in the Babylonian month of Kislimu, which is the Jewish month Kislev and, indeed, the one in which Hanukkah is celebrated. Now, can't history be fun? Truth is so much more fun and interesting than silly mythology and fairy-tales.
This is the description often attached to Halley's Comet. In another instance, the comparison by Josephus of the Comet to a celestial sword, as it is also depicted in the Bayeux tapestry, has led some scholars to suggest that the Angel of the of the Lord that King David saw "standing between the earth and heaven, having a sword in his hand stretched out over Jerusalem" (I Chronicles 21:16--for you inquiring minds) might have been in reality Halley's Comet, sent by the Lord to punish the king for having conducted prohibited census. The time of this incident, circa 1000 B.C., certainly coincides with one of the years in which Halley's Comet should have appeared.
In an article published in your year 1986 by Zecharia Sitchin, he pointed out that the Hebrew name for "comet" is Kokhave shavita "Scepter star". This has a direct bearing on the biblical tale of the seer Bilam. When the Israelites ended their wanderings in the desert after the Exodus and began the conquest of Canaan, the Moabite king summoned Bilam to curse the Israelites. But Bilam, realizing that the Israelite advance was divinely ordained, blessed them instead. He did so, he explained (Numbers 24"17), because he was shown a celestial vision:
I see it, though not now;
I behold, though it is not near;
A star of Jacob did course,
A scepter of Israel did arise.
Mr. Sitchin has provided you with a chronology that fixed the date of the "Exodus" at 1433 B.C.; the Israelite entry into Canaan began forty years later, in 1393 B.C. Halley's Comet, at an interval of 76 and 77 years, would have appeared circa 1390 B.C. Did Bilam consider that event as a divine signal that the Israelite (as they are NOW called) advanced could not and should not be stopped? If, in biblical times, the comet called Halley's was considered the Scepter Star of "Israel" (israel--God's chosen), it could explain why the Jewish revolts of 164 B.C. and A.D. 66 were timed to coincide with the comet's appearances. [Or, could it have been OTHER more important coincidences? and not, after all, the "Sword Comet"!]
TIME OF VISITORS, SHIPS AND NEPHILIM
You will be wise in the remembering as we unfold this that THIS Nibiru passage between Jupiter and Mars once every 3,600 years causes great disruptions. When this "planet of God" begins to move close to Earth, the Nephilim begin to make the journey to your planet in increasing numbers. Thus you will find craft abounding, visitors abounding and guidance as well as practical assistance to God's chosen (i)sraelites abounding.
It is significant that in spite of the crushing defeat of the Judean revolt by the Romans in A.D. 66, the Jews took up arms again some seventy years later in a heroic effort to free Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple. The leader of that revolt, Shimeon Bar Kosiha, was renamed by the religious leaders Bar Kokhba, "Son of the Star", specifically because of the above-quoted verses in Numbers 24.
I want you to use your heads now and don't go bonkers with your calendars and calculations. There are OTHER cycling planets and orbiting heavenly bodies besides Nibiru which massively impact your globe. Also, as in the case of planets outgrown their ability to wisely cope with technology --time-tables are altered according to need of attention to a species upon such planets. Also, ones from the last encounter with Nibiru/Marduk left many Nephilim ON YOUR PLACE to prepare and provide for this very day of cycle changes which would be devastating. I suggest you not go back to sleep if your addition doesn't quite add up. You do not have good records on your place and other things from Cosmic aspect can be changed in the blink of an eye.
It is obvious that the revolt the Romans put down after some three years, in A.D. 135, was also intended as was the Maccabean one, to achieve the rededication of the Temple by the time of the return of Halley's Comet, in A.D. 142. The realization that you, in 1986, have seen and experienced the return of a majestic celestial body that had great historic impact in the past, should send a shudder down some spines.
However, the 1986 Halley's Comet visit didn't see a rebuilt Jerusalem--IN JERUSALEM, did it? What could that mean? It can mean several things--one, that the temple in point would be in the "New Jerusalem" which is in the Philippines--not yet risen into view. Further, that Halley's is NOT the comet in question. This can be plainly seen in the absence of the all-out "in-spite-of" thrust at rebuilding the so-called Jewish Temple in Jerusalem prior to that time. There is a whole heck of a lot of information KEPT FROM YOU-THE--PEOPLE!
How far back does this messenger called Halley's go? According to the Sumerian creation epic, it goes all the way back to the time of the Celestial Battle. Halley's Comet and its like are truly the Messengers of Genesis and were known as such.
OUR SOLAR SYSTEM
The Solar System, astronomers and physicists believe, was formed out of a primordial cloud of gaseous matter; like everything else in the universe, it was in constant motion--circling about its galaxy (the Milky Way) and rotating around its own center of gravity. Slowly the cloud spread as it cooled; slowly the center became a star (our Sun) and the planets coalesced out of the rotating disc of gaseous matter. Thenceforth, the motion of all parts of the Solar System retained the original direction of the primordial cloud, anticlockwise. The planets orbit the sun in the same direction as did the original nebula; so do their satellites, or moons; so should also the debris that either did not coalesce or that resulted from the disintegration of bodies such as comets and asteroids. Everything must keep going anticlockwise. Everything must also remain within the plane of the original disk, which is called the Ecliptic.
Nibiru/Marduk did not conform to all that. Its orbit, as previously reviewed, was retrograde --in the opposite direction, clockwise. Its effect on Pluto --which according to the Sumerian texts was GA.GA and was shifted by Nibiru to its present orbit, which is not within the ecliptic but inclined 17 degrees to it--suggests that Nibiru itself followed an inclined path. Relative to the ecliptic it arrived from the southeast, from under the ecliptic; formed an arc above the ecliptic, then plunged back below the ecliptic in its journey back to where it had come from.
Halley's Comet shows the same characteristics, students, and except for the fact that its orbit is so much smaller than that of Nibiru (currently about 76 years compared with Nibiru's 3,600 Earth-years), an illustration of Halley's orbit could give you a good idea of Nibiru's inclined and retrograde path. In fact, Halley's Comet could be accepted as a sort of miniature Nibiru. This orbital similarity is but one of the aspects that make this Comet, and others too, messengers from the past--not only the historic past, but all the way back to the beginning (Genesis).
* * *
6/10/92 #3 HATONN
Halley's Comet is not alone in having an orbit markedly inclined to the ecliptic (a feature measured as an angle of Declination) and a retrograde direction. Nonperiodic comets--comets whose paths form not ellipses but parabolas or even hyperbolas and whose orbits are so vast and whose limits are so far away they cannot even be calculated--have marked declinations, and about half of them move in a retrograde direction. Of about 600 periodic comets (which are now given the letter "P" in front of their name) that have been classified and catalogued, about 500 have orbital periods longer than 200 years; they all have declinations more akin to that of Halley's than to the greater declinations of the nonperiodic comets, and more than half of them course in retrograde motion. Comets with medium orbital periods (between 200 and 20 years) and short periods (under 20 years) have a mean declination of 18 degrees, and some, like Halley's, have retained the retrograde motion in spite of the immense gravitational effects of Jupiter. It is noteworthy that of recently discovered comets, the one designated P / Hartley-IRAS (1938v) has an orbital period of 21 years, and its orbit is both retrograde and inclined to the ecliptic.
DIRTY SNOWBALLS AND OORT CLOUDS
Where do comets come from, and what causes their odd orbits, of which the retrograde direction is the oddest in astronomers' eyes? In the 1820's the Marquis Pierre-Simon de Laplace believed that comets were made of ice and that their glowing head ("coma") and tail that formed as they neared the Sun, were both made of vaporized ice. This concept was replaced after the discovery of the extent and nature of the asteroid belt, and theories developed that comets were "flying sandbanks"--pieces of rock that might be the remains of a disintegrated planet. The thinking changed again in the 1950's mainly because of two hypothesis: Fred L. Whipple (then of Harvard) suggested that comets were "dirty snowballs" of ice (mainly water ice) mixed with darker specks of sand-like material; and Jan Oort, a Dutch astronomer, proposed that long-period comets come from a vast reservoir halfway between the Sun and the nearer stars. Because comets appear from all directions (traveling prograde, or anticlockwise; retrograde; and at different declinations), the reservoir of comets--billions of them--is not a belt or ring like the asteroid belt or the rings of Saturn but a sphere that surrounds the Solar System. This "Oort Cloud", as the concept came to be named, settled at a mean distance, Oort calculated, of 100,000 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, one AU being the distance (93 million miles) of the Earth from the Sun. Well, perhaps God just keeps them lined up ready to fling off in the direction of planets needing discipline?
COMETS ARE "WILD CARDS"
Because of perturbations and intercometal collisions, some of the cometary horde may have come closer, to only 50,000 AU from the Sun (which is still ten thousand times the distance of Jupiter from the Sun). Passing stars occasionally perturb these comets and send them flying toward the Sun. Some, under the gravitational influence of the planets, mainly Jupiter, become medium or short-period comets; some, especially influenced by the mass of Jupiter, are forced into reversing their course. This, briefly, is how the Oort Cloud concept is usually stated. This however, is not correct. Comets are the one starcraft "system" that can be totally controlled without consideration of any of those planetary restrictions. Until you can come into the realization of this fact, you cannot realize the changes destined to occur in your upcoming near future.
But let us continue to look at that which is recognized in scientific circles. Since the 1950's the number of observed comets has increased by more than 50 percent, and computer technology has made possible the projection backward of cometary motions to determine their source. This is proof enough that science is full of "it". How could comets have "increased" by more that 50 percent? What has changed?
One team at the Harvard-Smithsonian Observatory under Brian G. Marsden has shown that of 200 observed comets with periods of 250 years or more, no more than 10 percent could have entered the Solar System from outer space; 90 percent have always been bound to the Sun as the focus of their orbits. This is total hogwash--"garbage in--garbage out"! But then Whipple covered the assets a bit by saying, "If we are really seeing comets coming from the void, we should expect them to fly by much faster than just 0.8 kilometers per second", which they do not. In other words--you don't really know a confounded thing about it--FOR SURE!
Now comes the next bug-in-the-boo: During the past few years, astronomers have questioned the simple view of Oort's Cloud--some still believe that the cloud exists, but the new results demand that they reconsider its size and shape. What are YOU to believe? I suggest that you start by considering "possibilities" of facts unknown to you or your scientists and check out every messenger that is allowed to pass your way.
The interesting aspect of the "reconsideration" of the Oort Cloud notion is new data suggesting that comets, by and large, have always been part of the Solar System and not just outsiders occasionally thrust into it.
What makes this Oort worthy of note? Not his solution to the problem of parabolic and hyperbolic cometal orbits and not the theory he had developed regarding other aspects of orbits. What was important was his consideration that they were "thrust out to there" and not "born" there. You know, sort of "flung off" as with a slingshot.
So maybe he warms up a bit in his suggestion that "The main process now is the inverse one, that of a slow transfer of comets from a large cloud into short-period orbits. But at the epoch at which the minor planets (asteroids) were formed...the trend must have been the opposite, many more objects being transferred from the asteroid region to the comet cloud. It appears far more probable that instead of having originated in the far-away regions, comets were born among the planets. It is natural to think in the first place of a relation with the minor planets (asteroids). There are indications that the two classes of objects"--"comets and asteroids--belong to the same 'species'. It seems reasonable to assume that the comets originated together with the minor planets" Summing up his study, Oort put it this way. "The existence of the huge cloud of comets finds a natural explanation of comets (and meteorites) are considered as minor planets escaped, at an early state of the planetary system, from the ring of asteroids."
Does this not all begin to sound like the Enuma elish....?
The principle conclusion of these suppositions is that the comets originated in a sort-of breakup event in the inner solar system. In all probability, it is speculated from your groups of wiser thinkers, that it was the same event which gave rise to the asteroid belt and which produced most of the meteors now being visualized. Why? Well, they don't say so but would it not appear that the same "other" bodies would be cycling at about the same "time"?
It was speculated that it was less certain that the same "breakup event" may have also given birth to the satellites of Jupiter, and the outer satellites of Mars and the outer satellites of Jupiter, and it was then estimated that the "breakup event" occurred some five million or so years ago. There didn't seem to be doubt however, that the "breakup event" took place "in the asteroid belt?. Physical, chemical, and dynamic properties of the resulting celestial bodies would indicate that a large planet did disintegrate where the asteroid belt is today located.
But what caused such a large planet to disintegrate? The most frequently asked questions about this scenario is how can a planet just blow up? Your people simply don't have any answers!
Ah but the Sumerians have one: the tale of Tiamat and Nibiru/Marduk, the Celestial Battle, the breakup of half of Tiamat, the annihilation of its moons (except for "Kingu"), and the forcing of their remains into a retrograde orbit.
EARTH, JUPITER--BANG, BANG
As to the "destroyed-planet" theory there always comes a key criticism: the whereabouts of the planet's matter; when astronomers estimate the total mass of the known asteroids and comets it adds up to only a fraction of the estimated mass of the broken-up planet. This is especially true if one estimate of the planet with a mass ninety times that of Earth is used in the calculations--which must be. This called for an increase in the mass of Jupiter by as much as 130 Earth-masses as a result of the capture of asteroids, including Jupiter's several retrograde moons. To allow for the discrepancy between the mass (ninety times that of Earth) of the broken-up planet and the accretion of 130 Earth-sized masses to Jupiter then Jupiter's mass can't hold true since other studies concluded that Jupiter's mass had decreases some time in its past, and there simply is a lack of mathematical "adding up".
Rather than to first inflate the size of Jupiter and then shrink it back, a better scenario might be to shrink the estimated size of the destroyed planet. That is what the Sumerian texts have put forth. IF Earth is the remaining half of Tiamat, then Tiamat was roughly twice the size of Earth, not ninety times. Studies of the asteroid belt reveal not only capture by Jupiter but a dispersion of the asteroids from their assumed original site at about 2.8 AU to a zone so wide that it occupies the space between 1.8 AU and 4 AU. Some asteroids are found between Jupiter and Saturn; a recently discovered one (2060 Chiron) is located between Saturn and Uranus at 13.6 AU. The smashup of the destroyed planet must have been, therefore, extremely forceful--as in a catastrophic collision!
HOW TO BACK IT UP?
What do you have to scientifically back this up? Not a bunch, but some. In addition to the voids between groups of asteroids, astronomers discern gaps within the clusters of asteroids. The latest theories seem to hold that there had been asteroids in the gaps but they were ejected, all the way to outer space except for those that may have been captured on the way by the gravitational forces of the outer planets; also, the asteroids that used to be in the "gaps" were probably destroyed by catastrophic collisions --at least that takes care of having to locate them. In the absence of valid explanations for such ejections and catastrophic collisions, the only plausible theory is that offered by the Sumerian texts, WHICH DESCRIBE THE ORBIT OF NIBIRU/MARDUK AS A VAST, ELLIPTICAL PATH THAT BRINGS IT PERIODICALLY (EVERY 3,600 EARTH YEARS [BY SOME CALCULATIONS] ), BACK INTO THE ASTEROID BELT. The conclusions drawn from the ancient texts were that Nibiru/Marduk passed by Tiamat on her outer, or Jupiter, side; repeated returns to that celestial zone can account for the size of the "gap" there. It is the periodic return of Nibiru/Marduk that causes the "ejecting" and "sweeping".
PIECES OF THE PUZZLE
By the acknowledgement of the existence of Nibiru and its periodic return to the Place of the Battle, the puzzle of the "missing matter" also finds a solution. It also addresses the theories that place the accretions of mass by Jupiter at a relatively recent time (millions, not billions, of years ago). Depending on where Jupiter was at the times of Nibiru's perihelion, the accretions might have occurred during various passages of Nibiru and not necessarily as a one-and-only event at the time of the catastrophic breakup of Tiamat. Indeed, spectrographic studies of asteroids reveal that some of them "were heated within the first few hundred million years after the origin of the solar system" by heat so intense as to melt them; "iron sank to their centers, forming strong stony-iron cores, while basaltic lavas floated to their surface, producing minor planets like Vesta". This according to McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Astronomy. The projected time of the catastrophe is the very time indicated in other writings, some 500 million years after the formation of the Solar System--based on the Sumerian information.
WATER: A CRUCIAL ROLE
It IS improving, however, as recent scientific advances in astronomy and astrophysics go beyond corroborating the Sumerian cosmogony in regard to the celestial collision as the common origin of the comets and the asteroids, the site of the collision (where the remains of the asteroid belt still orbit), or even the time of the catastrophic event, some 4 billion years ago. They also corroborate the ancient texts in the vital matter of water.
The presence of water, the mingling of waters, the separation of waters--all somehow played an important role in the tale of Tiamat, Nibiru/Marduk, and the Celestial Battle and its aftermath. Part of the puzzle was already answered when we showed that the ancient notion of the asteroid belt as a divider of the waters "above" and the water "below" is corroborated by modern science. But there was more to this preoccupation with water. Tiamat was described as a "watery monster", and the Mesopotamian texts speak of the handling of her waters by Nibiru/Marduk:
Half of her he stretched as a ceiling to be Sky,
Crossing he posted it to guard;
Not to allow her waters to escape was its command.
The concept of an asteroid belt not only as a divider between the water of the planets above and below it but also as a "guardian" of Tiamat's own waters is echoed in the biblical verses of Genesis, where the explanation is given that the "Hammered-out bracelet" was also called Shama'im, the place "where the waters were". References to the waters where the Celestial Battle and the creation of the Earth and the Shama'im took place are frequent in the Old Testament, indicating millennia-old familiarity with Sumerian cosmogony even at the time of the Prophets and Judean kings. An example is found in Psalm 104, which depicts the Creator as the Lord
Who has stretched out the Shama'im as a curtain,
Who in the waters for His ascents put a ceiling.
These verses are almost a word-for-word copy of the verses in Enuma elish; in both instances, the placing of the asteroid belt "where the waters were" followed the earlier acts of the splitting up of Tiamat and having the invader's "wind" thrust the half that became Earth into a new orbit. The waters of Earth would explain the whereabouts of some or most of Tiamat's waters. But what about the remains of her other part and of her satellites? If the asteroids and comets are those remains, should they not also contain water?
VARIED WATERY OCCURRENCE
What would have been a preposterous suggestion when these objects were deemed "chunks of debris" and "flying sandbanks" has turned out, as the result of recent discoveries, to be not so preposterous: the asteroids are celestial objects in which water--yes, water--is a major component.
Most asteroids belong to two classes as you can recognize them. About 15 percent belong to the S type, which have reddish surfaces made up of silicates and metallic iron. About 75 percent are the C type: they are carbonaceous (containing carbon), and it is these that have been found to contain water. The water discovered in such asteroids through spectrographic studies is not in liquid form; since asteroids have no "atmospheres", any water on their surface would quickly dissipate. But the presence of water molecules in the surface materials indicates that the minerals that make up the asteroid have captured water and combined with it. Direct confirmation of this finding was observed in August 1982, when a small asteroid that came too close to Earth plunged into the Earth's atmosphere and disintegrated; it was seen as "a rainbow with a long tail going across the sky". A rainbow appears when sunlight falls on a collection of water drops, such as rain, fog, or spray.
When the asteroid is more like what its name originally implied, "minor planet", actual water in liquid form could well be present. Examination of the infrared spectrum of the largest and first-to-be-discovered asteroid, Ceres, shows an extra dip in the spectral readings that is the result of free water rather than water bound to minerals. Since free water, even on Ceres will quickly evaporate, the astronomers surmise that Ceres must have a constant source of water welling up from its interior.
The celestial body designated 2060 Chiron, interesting in many ways, also confirms the presence of water in the remnants of the Celestial Battle. When Charles Kowal of the Hale Observatories on Mount Palomar, California, (where the Photon secret studies are going on) discovered it in November 1977, he was not certain what it was. He simply referred to it as a planetoid, named it temporarily "O-K" for "Object Kowal", and opined that it might be a wayward satellite of either Saturn or Uranus. Several weeks of follow-up studies revealed an orbit much more elliptical than that of planets or planetoids, one closer to that of comets. By 1981 the object was determined to be an asteroid, perhaps one of others to be found reaching as far out as Uranus, Neptune or beyond, and was given the designation 2060 Chiron. However, by 1989, further observations by astronomers at Kitt Peak National Observatory (Arizona) detected an extended atmosphere of carbon dioxide and dust around Chiron, suggesting that it is more comet-like. The latest observations have also established that Chiron "is essentially a dirty snowball composed of water, dust and carbon-dioxide ice."
If Chiron proves to be more a comet than an asteroid, it will only serve as further evidence that both classes of these remnants of the Genesis event contain water.
When a comet is far away from the Sun, it appears as a dark and invisible object. As it nears the Sun, the Sun's radiation brings the comet's nucleus to life. It develops a gaseous head (the coma) and then a tail made up of gases and dust ejected by the nucleus as it heats up --or at least this is the way it appears and is thus accepted as good data. It is the observation of these assumed emissions that has by and largely confirmed views that comets are sometimes "dirty snowballs". Spectroscopic analysis of the emissions have shown the presence of the compound water.
The presence of water in comets has been definitely established in recent years through enhanced examination of arriving comets. Comet Kohoutek (1974) was studied not only from Earth but also with rockets, from orbiting manned spacecraft (Skylab) but more especially from Soviet craft. Subsequent cometary observation have confirmed these findings to great extent. However NONE of these studies, accomplished with a variety of instruments, match the intensity with which Halley's Comet was probed in 1986. The Halley findings established unequivocally (at least for earth-scientists' comfort) that the comet was a watery celestial body.
This 1986 comet was met by many unmanned spacecraft; Soviet, Japanese and the European Space Agency all launched craft. This seemed to give some credence to the speculation that the Star of Bethlehem in the tale of the birth of Christ was, indeed, the comet. NO, it was NOT. However, the flowing "tail" of the Star of Bethlehem indicated celestial "manipulation" of some sort.
WHY THESE SPECULATIONS?
Intensive observations began when Halley's Comet developed its coma and tail in November 1985. Developed its tail and coma??? --this is worthy of thought for would it not ALWAYS have its coma and tail? Astronomers at the Kitt Peak Observatory tracking the comet with telescopes reported it was certain "that the comet's dominant constituent in water ice, and that much of the tenuous 360,000-mile-wide cloud surrounding it consisted of water vapor". Other claims were that "this was the first strong evidence that water ice was prevalent", and other equally ridiculous assumptions. This does not indicate anything of the such necessarily but those telescopic observations were augmented in January 1986 by infrared observations from high-altitude aircraft, whereupon a team made up of NASA scientists and astronomers from several American universities announced "direct confirmation that water was a major constituent of Halley's comet". It was also then when it was discovered that there would be an inescapable passage into a Photon Belt accompanied by "different" waves of radiation and the increased hype upon hype about the so-called ozone depletion.
By January 1986, Halley's Comet had developed an immense tail and a halo of hydrogen gas that measured 12.5 million miles across --fifteen times bigger than the diameter of the Sun. How could all this prediction of "development" have been speculated? Does a comet or heavenly cosmic body "develop" things just because they come within your vision allowance? Why would the loss of water be increased as it neared perihelion on March 6th? It was noted that the comet was losing 12 tons of water per second. That water loss was speculated to increase enormously--first to 30 tons a second and then on to 70 tons a second. Boy, you were saved from dissolution of the orb itself by an assurance of the scientists to the press that "even at this rate Halley's Comet had enough water ice to last thousands of more orbits." Whew, for a minute I thought the "messenger" might vanish.
I guess this is enough on Halley's Comet but the point of this was to assure you that as the Sumerian texts have told you--there was water everywhere on these "Messengers of Genesis"!
I would guess that what this actually tells you is that you really don't know very much of anything about "out-there" and " what is out there". For instance, let us look briefly at the
When the Anunnaki's Mission Earth reached its full complement, there were six hundred of them of Earth, while three hundred remained in orbit, servicing the shuttle craft. The Sumerian term for the latter was IGI.GO, literally "Those who observe and see."
Archaeologists have found in Mesopotamia many objects they call "eye idols", as well as shrines dedicated to these "gods". Texts refer to devices used by the Anunnaki to "scan the Earth from end to end". These texts and depictions imply the use by the Anunnaki of Earth-orbiting, celestial "seeing eyes"--satellites that "observe and see". How interesting!
Would you believe, the coincidence is that some of the Earth-scanning, and especially fixed-position communications satellites launched in your own modern times look very much like these millennia-old depictions. So, who might be deceiving who as regards historical facts about your origins and early travels? Why has not "religion" integrated the information? I think we ALL KNOW THAT ANSWER!
Hatonn to clear.
Phoenix Journal #50: THROUGH DARKNESS INTO LIGHT, Chap. 11 and 12.
THANK YOU Rocky Montana
(Red highlighting added)