QUESTION AND ANSWER CONCERNING THE CREDIBILITY OF NESARA
Patrick H. Bellringer
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 12:02 AM
Subject: Does this apply to http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1335536677
In the information contained on your http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1335536677 page, it is stated, in part, that "Because President Clinton’s clone had no interest in signing NESARA into law on October 10, 2000; under orders from U.S. military generals the elite Naval Seals and Delta Force stormed the White House and under gunpoint forced Bill Clinton to sign NESARA." If, per http://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/calcrim/1800/1832.html , http://voices.yahoo.com/how-prove-documents-were-signed-under-duress-699086.html . http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/duress , http://www.lawguru.com/articles/law/business-law/signing-under-duress-when-does-it-render-a-contract-void , & others, the use of force in obtaining a signature is considered extortion, and renders the signature/document void, does this principle also apply to the act of forcing "Bill Clinton" to sign NESARA ???
FROM: Patrick H. Bellringer
DATE: April 28, 2012
Thank you for your question concerning Bill Clinton signing NESARA under duress.
If you understand the true history of the American Republic, you should know that all presidents beginning with, and including Lincoln, have committed treason by defying the true Constitution of the Republic. Lincoln avoided Congressional action and began the first executive orders. Gradually, Constitutional law was eroded, until Roosevelt placed the Corporate U.S. Government on top of the Constitutional government, removed gold standard banking and brought in Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) law. No action by any president has been lawful under constitutional or common law since then.
The Corporate U.S. Congress did not pass NESARA. Only the fifteen members, who did not hold foreign titles of nobility, as prescribed by the 13th Amendment, in other words who were not attorneys, doctors, clergymen, etc., were allowed to vote on NESARA. Only these fifteen could lawfully vote under the Constitution of the Republic, because only they represented the "true Congress".
Bill Clinton was the executive head or president of the U.S. Corporation/Government at that time, and would never agree to sign any legislation not supporting the U.S. Corporation. In fact by signing NESARA Clinton would be removing himself and the Corporate U.S. Government from power. To my knowledge to be lawful the occupant of the office of "president" had to sign NESARA. Thus, he was "persuaded" to do so.
The Corporate system retaliated immediately by purging the Federal Registry of NESARA, moving all NESARA records to the U.S. Supreme Court files and have the court place a gag order on all NESARA information.
Because I am not an authority on law, I do not know what else may have bearing on your question. I do know that the NESARA legislation is totally credible, valid and lawful under the Constitution of the Republic to restore balance not only to America, but to the nations of our world.
In Love and Light,
Patrick H. Bellringer