Urgent Update On Connecticut Shooting

SHORT LITTLE REBEL

Friends, there is a gift that God has given me:  I can smell something fishy a mile away.  Like Benghazi.  Almost on day one, I told my husband:  “The facts don’t make sense.  Something is wrong here.”  Last night, after I saw a talking head interview (or, I should say, NOT interview) the father of the boy who saw his teacher get shot and ran for his life with a couple of friends, I told my husband, “Something is not right here.  She didn’t ask a single relevant question.  So far, this boy is the only eye-witness of the gunman coming forward.  She didn’t ask if the boy saw one or more shooters.  She didn’t ask any details of what the gunman did first, second, third.  She didn’t ask for a description of the gunman.  These reporters are complete prostitutes.  They could care less about the feelings of the people they interview.  So why didn’t she ask any of these questions?”  In fact, I could tell she was biting back questions.  I looked at my husband and said,  “Cal, this thing is starting to stink.  By now, there should be many eye-witness accounts of the actual gunman.  There should be breathless survivors talking about how this guy walked by their room, etc.  About how they narrowly escaped.  But so far, it looks like every single eye-witness is dead.  That is IMPOSSIBLE!”

I watched the situation LIVE.  There were original reports of a second man who was found in the woods that they had put in custody.  This man was NEVER spoken of again.  Why?  The details of the shooting changed enormously from one minute to the next.  Inside sources at the police departments were reporting one thing while the official accounts said completely different information.  The news reports were full of such ambiguous NON statements that I was furiously looking throughout the internet to find solid evidence or eye-witness accounts to clarify.  None was to be found.  One example:  They originally said that the shooter was buzzed in via the front office’s new video security system.  Then, the news report said, “The shooter was NOT voluntarily buzzed into the school.”  What the heck does THAT mean?  Does that mean he forced his way through the system?  Does that mean they have video evidence of his face?  Does that mean that there was someone on the inside putting a gun to someone’s head to buzz the shooter in?  Huh?

Also, it seems highly unlikely, based on descriptions of Adam, that he could have purchased all that black ops gear!  The guy is described as being so shy that he would hug the school walls when someone approached him!  Also, first the news definitely says the mother was a teacher and the classroom of dead kids was her class.  Then, reports are that she had nothing to do with the school.  So, why the shooting there?  Also, the number and kind of weapons used changed.  Also, where they discovered the weapons.  Sometimes they reported that all the weapons were in the school.  Then they said the rifle was in the car.  But they also said that the shooter used the rifle to kill every single person with multiple shots.

continue at Short Little Rebel:

http://shortlittlerebel.wordpress.com/2012/12/16/urgent-update-on-connecticut-shooting/

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/urgent-update-on-connecticut-shooting-2518128.html