TO BE CLEAR, STATES ARE NOT FREE OR INDEPENDENT
Clint Richardson firstname.lastname@example.org Writes:
To be clear, States are not free or independent.
To be clear, States cannot succeed from the United States.
To be perfectly clear, States are "corporations" of the United States.
To be indefatigably clear, States are fictional "governments" created by the United States, not by the people.
Please read the enabling acts of each "State" and you will understand that the "State" is not the "Land", and that land was pledged to the United States and is owned by the United States.
For instance... Montana and North Dakota is on that list
Here is an excerpt from the "Enabling Act of 1889".
AN ACT to provide for the division of Dakota into two States and to enable the people of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Washington to form constitutions and State governments and to be admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States, and to make donations of public lands to such States.
(Approved February 22, 1889.) [25 U.S. Statutes at Large, c 180 p 676.]
Second. That the people inhabiting said proposed States do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within the boundaries thereof, and to all lands lying within said limits owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes; and that until the title thereto shall have been extinguished by the United States, the same shall be and remain subject to the disposition of the United States, and said Indian lands shall remain under the absolute jurisdiction and control of the Congress of the United States; that the lands belonging to citizens of the United States residing without the said States shall never be taxed at a higher rate than the lands belonging to residents thereof; that no taxes shall be imposed by the States on lands or property therein belonging to or which may hereafter be purchased by the United States or reserved for its use. But nothing herein, or in the ordinances herein provided for, shall preclude the said States from taxing as other lands are taxed any lands owned or held by any Indian who has severed his tribal relations, and has obtained from the United States or from any person a title thereto by patent or other grant, save and except such lands as have been or may be granted to any Indian or Indians under any act of Congress containing a provision exempting the lands thus granted from taxation; but said ordinances shall provide that all such lands shall be exempt from taxation by said States so long and to such extent as such act of Congress may prescribe.
So... to be absolutely and perfectly clear... "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free - to succeed!"
Perhaps you should look at your "State's" enabling act. You'll find them to all be uniform in their wording, as uniform commercial code (ucc) often is.
Folks, the very fact that these "States" are on their knees asking- no begging for Obama to release them from their corporate contract with the United States instead of forcibly demanding with guns ready to defend their actions should be enough to show you that States are property of the United States, and not of the people.
Sorry to burst your constitutional bubble. But then, ya'll probably still believe that the constitution makes you free men and gives you rights!
Clint Richardson: email@example.com