Casey Anthony Child Murder Verdict Proves American Insanity
Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
The case itself involved a young Florida woman named Casey Anthony who stood accused of killing her two-year-old daughter Caylee [both pictured top photo left] and then abandoning the body in a small wooded area near her home where it was not discovered until 31 days later.
Under the American system of jurisprudence (science or philosophy of law) as enshrined in their Constitution, Ms Anthony was indicted for her alleged crime(s) by a Grand Jury of her peers, arrested for same, jailed without bond or bail for 3 years, tried by another Jury of her peers in open court, and yesterday was found to be “Not Guilty” of the three most serious charges against her.
Ms Anthony was, however, convicted by this same jury on 4 counts of providing to police false information which carry a combined sentence of 4 years in prison leaving many US legal experts to believe she will be freed at her sentencing hearing due to take place tomorrow, 7 July, or, at the most, be sentenced to be incarcerated for less than a year.
Having worked the way it was intended to, Ms Anthony was the latest beneficiary of what can only be described as one of the best justice systems ever devised in a civilized society for determining guilt or innocence as the US Constitution provides that all Americans who are charged with a crime are “innocent before proven guilty” and can only be convicted upon proof of evidence showing that “beyond a reasonable doubt” the accused is, indeed, guilty of the crime they have been charged with.
The exact instructions regarding “reasonable doubt” given by the Judge overseeing Ms Anthony’s trial to the Jury charged with determining her guilt or innocence said:
“A reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt, a speculative imaginary or forced doubt . . . on the other hand, if after carefully considering, comparing and weighing all the evidence there is not an abiding conviction of guilt, or, if having a conviction, it is one which is not stable but which waivers and vacillates, then the charge is not proved beyond every reasonable doubt and you must find the defendant not guilty because the doubt is reasonable. It is to the evidence introduced in this trial, and to it alone, that you are to look to that proof.”
The US Constitutional protections against a Jury convicting an American citizen of a crime based on passion or prejudice, or for any reason outside of the evidence presented in open court, stands nearly unique in the world today, and is especially relevant when compared to the over 10,000 civilian protesters sentenced to prison in Egypt by secret military tribunals over these past few months not even allowed to know the charges against them.
Though the “Not Guilty” verdicts handed down by the Jury to Ms Anthony neither proves her guilt or innocence, it does show that 12 of her fellow citizens found that the evidence presented against her did not meet the high standard of proving that she committed the crimes of which she was accused of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” a verdict, mind you, one would think would be celebrated for its upholding of the highest ideas of the US Constitution as what stands for one of these people, especially the weakest and most despised, stands for them all.
Far from celebrating this latest affirmation of the unique power of their Constitution, however, the vast majority of the American people have, instead, launched into what can only be called as an insane attack upon it by impugning the Jury that found Ms Anthony “Not Guilty.”
The reason for them doing so lies in the massive Cable TV and Social Media coverage given throughout Ms Anthony’s tortured saga through the US legal system proclaiming her guilt leading one of her defense attorneys Cheney Mason to state yesterday after the verdict was handed down, “I hope that this is a lesson to those of you that have indulged in media assassination for three years. Bias, prejudice and incompetent heads saying what would be and how to be. I'm disgusted by some of the lawyers who have done this.”
The “lesson” Attorney Mason wanted the American media to “learn,” however, appears to have fallen on deaf ears as the drumbeat of propaganda US media commentary against Ms Anthony and the Jury that acquitted her are creating what can only be described as a “lynch mob mentality” against what is in essence the US Constitution itself.
What these insane Americans are failing to note in their propaganda media driven uproar is that it wasn’t the Jury that acquitted Ms Anthony; it was, in fact, their own Constitution, the single most important document to freedom ever conceived, but which is now under an assault so great many wonder if it will be able to survive the many grave crisis’s facing the United States today.
As history has all to often shown, an American public whipped into fear and/or anger stand always eager to shred to the very protections given to them in their Constitution by their Founding Fathers for whatever “remedy of the moment” put before them by their elite masters. So dangerous has it become to be an American today, and as we detailed in our 2 June report “Russia Warns American Police State Now Rivals That Of Nazi SS,” that instead of being the freest people on Earth, they have become the most controlled.
The great American Founding Father Benjamin Franklin once warned his fellow countrymen, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Unfortunately, at least for those denouncing their own Constitution through Ms Anthony’s trial verdict being whipped into a frenzy by their propaganda media organs, these wise words today are falling on deaf ears.
© July 6, 2011 EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.
[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]