President of Italian Supreme Court Calls for International Criminal Investigation into 9/11 Attacks
The President of the Italian Supreme Court, Fernando Imposimato, has reportedly called for a criminal investigation into the tragic attacks on September 11, 2001 and even went as far as to draw connections between historical “false flag” incidents such as those organized by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in Italy as part of Operation Gladio (which some claim has reared its ugly head once more).
In a quite vitriolic letter published by the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Imposimato pulls no punches, opening the letter with the searing statement:
“The 9/11 attacks were a global state terror operation permitted by the administration of the USA, which had foreknowledge of the operation yet remained intentionally unresponsive in order to make war against Afghanistan and Iraq.”
“To put it briefly, the 9/11 events were an instance of the strategy of tension enacted by political and economic powers in the USA to seek advantages for the oil and arms industries,” wrote Imposimato.
Imposimato is no stranger to high-profile cases, having served on the Anti-Mafia Commission during three different administrations, investigating the assassination of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro along with the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II.
In calling the 9/11 attacks an instance of the strategy of tension, or strategia della tensione, Imposimato is linking them to the decades of brutal violence carried out by Western intelligence agencies and their agents throughout the Mediterranean.
This is no minor accusation, evidenced by the quite powerful statements made condemning Gladio contained in the European Parliament resolution on Gladio, which passed on November 22, 1990.
Even though the resolution, “Condemns the clandestine creation of manipulative and operational networks and Calls for a full investigation into the nature, structure, aims and all other aspects of these clandestine organizations or any splinter groups,” a full investigation was never truly carried out.
Imposimato brought up several facts which prove highly problematic for the government’s official account of the events of September 11, 2001, including the clearly abnormal collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
Imposimato also pointed to the fact that there were reports of the CIA meeting with Osama Bin Laden, the man allegedly behind the attacks, in July of 2001. It is also important to point out that Bin Laden was once a CIA asset and worked closely with Zbigniew Brzezinski.
“Insider trading is further strong evidence against the CIA, FBI and US government,” continues Imposimato.
“Articles by Professor Paul Zarembka, as well as by Kevin Ryan and others, prove such insider trading took place in the days immediately prior to the attacks. Yet this insider trading has been denied by the FBI and 9/11 commission.”
In his four page scathing letter, Imposimato presents several compelling lines of evidence which simply demand explanation, examination and investigation.
To ignore these clear holes in the official story is to force oneself into a blinding state of complete ignorance in which one must simply ignore massive amounts of evidence in favor of pure fantasy.
Imposimato concluded his letter by writing, “The only possibility for achieving justice is to submit the best evidence concerning the involvement of specific individuals in 9/11 to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and ask him to investigate according to the articles 12, 13 15 and 17, letters a and b, of the Statute of the ICC,” after which he cites the quite poignant preamble of the Statute.
Unfortunately, it appears to be quite clear that this pattern of terrorist incidents which leave more questions unanswered than they address – some of which have strong indications of government involvement – has not ceased.
Unless Imposimato’s suggestions are taken seriously, the only reasonable thing is to expect more manufactured terrorism and an increasingly brutal police state supported by widespread surveillance and a complete refusal to recognize even our most basic rights.
This article originally appeared on End the Lie