'CRUCIFIXTION OF THE PHOENIX' - PHOENIX JOURNAL #12 -CHAPTER 6
ESU IMMANUEL SANANDA
‘CRUCIFIXTION OF THE PHOENIX’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #12 - CHAPTER 6
REC #3 SANANDA
THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 1990 3:00 P.M. YEAR 3, DAY 141
I AM SANANDA.
Dharma, you will please relax for I am most capable of handling these slings and arrows. I don’t believe I ever misled you into thinking there would be none. I realize that we require you to write and function in ignorance but it is most necessary and worthy indeed.
As we come forth with truth, the chaff has to be sorted away and it is for these reasons that I have held up the forwarding of the new formatted documents to press. There is only one way to fish and that is with bait, my dear. So be it.
This is in response to correspondence sent to GG from one known as JD. He was most propitious to have sent the inquiries to the source and, therefore, it shall be myself that shall respond. I am working, of course, under the assumption that that was the intent. I mention “the assumption” for it was not the intent at all. The intent of the correspondence was to stop GG and hopefully scare the living daylights out of him. It will not be effective. I would herein suggest that you ones all continue to play games long past the time of game-playing. It is the time of truth and the era of the prophecies and revelations and you are in grave, grave circumstances.
I believe it is most obvious that in all instances we have acted in protection of Eduard Meier and I am weary of ones who call themselves “brothers” causing him more controversy and negative attention. Of course Billy Meier made errors, and errors were made throughout all human documents but the real “users” and perpetrators of betrayer behavior shall be flushed out into the truth of openness.
In responding it appears the best way to cover all the information is to simply quote the notations and allow for my response. First, I believe it wise that all of you fully understand who I am for there is obvious lack of knowledge on the part of the writer of the correspondence.
I AM THE ONE KNOWN AS ESU, “JESUS”, IMMANUEL, EMMANUEL, JMMANUEL, IISA, EISA, ISA ETC., ETC., ETC., AD NAUSEUM. MR. D HONORS ME, PERHAPS, BY CITING AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL, I AM SANANDA AS “SANANDA’S VERSION”. I WOULD MOST SURELY HOPE SO FOR IT IS THE STORY WRITTEN INTO THE SACRED RECORDS OF ONE JUDAS ISCARIOTH, MY MOST BELOVED AND FAITHFUL FRIEND WHO WAS BADLY, BADLY USED THROUGH THE CENTURIES OF YOUR TIME IN COUNTING. YOU SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO TAINT THIS BEAUTEOUS SOUL LONGER. YOU WILL HEED MY WORDS HEREIN AND YOU HAD BETTER HEED THEM MOST CAREFULLY INDEED.
Next, I shall set the record straight as to the writing and any connection with what you refer to as GG’s version of the TALMUD JMMANUEL. ’TIS YOU, FRIEND JIM, WHO IS MISLED—SORELY.
This scribe is exactly that—a scribe. AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL was put to print and a copy of the original intended publication sent to GG long prior to any association between GG and the scribe. As a matter of record, Mr. D, it was sent with several manuscripts which were set for publication. It was compiled and printed for more than six weeks before any contact with Mr. G.
On October 16, 1989 a meeting was arranged with Commander Hatonn, this scribe, Oberli and GG in Victorville, California. At that time G brought a photocopy of his previously handled book (in a simple xerox form) and showed it to the other mentioned parties.
NOW, HOWEVER, WE SHALL COME UP WITH SOME REASONABLE ANSWERS FROM YOU ONES WHO CONTINUE TO HOLD THIS INFORMATION HOSTAGE IN YOUR GREED AND WARMONGERING. YOU EITHER DO NOT BELIEVE THE TRUTH OF IT AND WISH TO PRINT IT FOR GAINFUL SPLASH OR YOU ARE DELIBERATELY KEEPING TRUTH FROM YOUR FELLOW-MAN WHO IS ABOUT TO SELF-DESTRUCT. I SHALL TAKE YOUR COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ONE FOLLOWING ANOTHER:
JD: Thanks for calling last night. I am concerned that the entity who is transmitting to Dharma is misleading the readers of And They Called His name Immanuel, I Am Sananda. I will refer to this as the Sananda version. So here are four questions from me you may direct to him on this topic.
(1) Why are you misleading readers of the Sananda version into thinking that the original sections of its pages 1-7 were spoken by Sananda when they actually come from the Foreword, written by Eduard Meier, to the Talmud Jmmanuel? Meier is not Sananda.
I do not believe that there has ever been any suggestion that Sananda and Meier are the same. I gave great honor to the writer of the document and made effort to protect him from exactly that which you now do, Mr. D Is it never enough that a man have his life threatened and live in fear without those who would use his work for their own gain, to continue to place him in jeopardy? The harvest of pain shall be most heavy for some of you who would use your brethren. It was never for the “UFO” material that Eduard was continually under threat of assassination; it was for the truth of the Living Christos. How dare you again place him in jeopardy. There never seems to be enough blood to be spilled and vampirized to suit the greedy human traitors. And you, Mr. D, are about to be hung out to dry by the original ripper-offers—that, dear friend, is NOT me.
Who has stolen information from whom? It would appear to me that the documents in question, and the scrolls from which they were recorded, happen to be MY PROPERTY AND THAT OF JUDAS ISCARIOTH! HOW DARE YOU TELL ME OF THAT WHICH I MIGHT DO WITH THE TRUTH OF IT.
JD: (2) Why are you transmitting to Dharma the errors that are present in the 1984 English version of the Talmud Jmmanuel once distributed briefly by GG? Can you not perceive the difference between truth and error? Following is an example:
On page 63 of the Sananda version, lines 7-8 from the bottom, an error in the 1984 version is perpetuated. The sentence, “Herod sent ones forth and had John beheaded while in prison” represents the extraneous verse No. 15:33 occurring in the 1984 version. It is obvious that this verse does not belong there in the English version because in the German version it is a verse with a different meaning, and because it is the same verse that appears as No. 16:12, a chapter later. This is a word-processor’s typographical error that you have perpetuated.
Yes, I can perceive the difference between truth and error! But in some instances it was most obvious that other ones involved in the tampering with the original scrolls and translations could not discern truth from LIES. Errors are acceptable—lies are not! Is it not past time that man stops interpreting and tampering with divine truth? Is there no way to stop the lies and expose those who are doing of the tampering except through this manner?
You are angry, Mr. D, for I suggest at this point of this writing, that YOU fully intended to publish again, the incorrect version that you refer to as the 1984 version. Further, I pronounce that the only reason you have not done so is that you have been unable to consummate a “deal” with the holders (unjustly so) of the “rights”. Well, you cannot afford the price they demand for they are unclean of intent and have sorely injured their co-workers in past time and you would not long be spared the hard lesson of that truth. I believe you will agree that those ones of whom I speak are L.& B.-E.
I have never been accused of ignorance nor lack of justice in my discernments.
I intentionally brought the document that you call Sananda’s version to GG because he has been badly used in the past, by the same ones. He has acted in honor and without malice whereby you might find his brethren have not.
JD: (3) Do you think that readers will not eventually learn that you merely transmitted GG’s 1984 English version of the Talmud Jmmanuel, altering some wording here and there and adding in your own remarks?
Whose version? My dear sir, are you by any chance suggesting that you are contemplating printing as truth some translated scrolls which are untruth? In your perception are the records valid or are they not? Truth is truth is truth—is it not? If Sananda’s version is a reflection of the 1984 version which you plan to reprint—is it truth or is it false? If it be truth and you proclaim to only desire to bring truth to your fellow-man — why do you proclaim to have been somehow offended or badly used?
These ones here (scribe), know not who you might be as they are not so much as familiar with your name! When Oberli said he had a letter needing response, to Dharma, her reply was “Who in the world is that?”— I suggest that there is far more to this than just a friendly complaint on behalf of my beloved friend, Billy Meier, or a notation regarding a typographical error of no importance to “content” what-so-ever. I further denounce L&B-E for having sorely used and deprived Billie Meier of his rightful properties and have conspired to keep him from having his rightful share of abundance. He has been forced into reclusion and taunted by lies and ridicule almost to the point of total dysfunction and no longer will you of greed get either into his pockets nor into the very destruction of his soul peace.
I hereby pronounce to all witnesses that one Eduard Meier, “Billy”, shall be given a share of any abundance returned from the dispersement of this document in point. He shall be rewarded for his planting and you of the grim reapers shall not take of the harvest. You have sorely misjudged the loyalty and care given unto man who interacts with the brothers and sisters of the Cosmos for they do not take lightly the cost of that participation. So be it.
JD: (4) Can you not perceive that you are setting GG up to be accused of fabricating this transmission to Dharma himself? It will be obvious to many that this transmission stems from G’s 1984 English edition of the Talmud Jmmanuel. They will know that the Sananda version should have acknowledged that Eduard Meier’s German version, translated from the Aramaic by the Lebanese ex-priest killed in 1976, is the source from which both the 1984 version and the Sananda version were derived.
After GG is discredited as having fabricated the Sanandaversion, he will be of little further use to you. Do you want that to happen?
Thanks, G I think both you and the thousands of holders of Meier’s German version of the Talmud Jmmanuel deserve some answers.
Why, Mr. D, would GG be accused of anything? As a matter of fact, he holds a disclaimer of Hold Harmless for any document he brings forth under my authorship or that of any of my people.
GG was badly, badly used by the group claiming goodness within the group surrounding the “Billy Meier materials”. He invested very large sums of money for publication of documents and was then stripped of rights and the resources having ones involved break both their word and their contracts. Unless, of course, you care to tell me, Mr. D, why GG would publish this document instead of simply producing the original 1984 version which you claim to be HIS?
For factual reference, we have given Eduard Meier gracious credit throughout all of the PHOENIX JOURNALS. Man has been like vultures to the carcass of this contact and it shall no longer be tolerated.
There is not even the remotest possibility that GG shall be discredited for any of his works. I further suggest the tone and insinuation of your term “use him” is most offensive. We are humbly grateful for his willing participation—again, at great expense to himself personally, to assist us in our efforts to bring truth unto mankind before the time-piece stops.
You ones who would reap personal gain and unearned reward at the expense of humankind are to be pitied for you are in no wise wise. Do you think not that I know of that which my children do? Your mouth utters words which do not match of your heart place—the lie within is the one that shall destroy. You are most fortunate indeed, that GG is a moral and gentle man for you ones are in no wise deserving of such graciousness.
I shall leave it to your discretion, G, as to whether or not this is placed in the forepiece of the reformatted material.
Oberli, you and Ranos may now finish the formatting, check with G and get the material shipped—quickly please.
I trust I have responded with the “deserved” answers. I have naught further to say unto you who dig and pick; I do have appreciation and gratitude unto GG who gives tirelessly unto his brothers—most of whom deserve it not. It is most grand indeed that judgment comes with Father/Mother’s GRACE for the intent of mortal man is vile indeed. I SHALL NOT BE FURTHER CRUCIFIED NOR SHALL MINE PEOPLE LONG CONTINUE TO BE MARTYRS! SO BE IT AND LET THIS WORD GO FORTH FOR I PLACE MINE SEAL UPON IT AS TRUTH AND AS SPOKEN SO SHALL IT COME TO BE FOR I BEAR THE AUTHORITY AND I AM COME AGAIN TO SEE TO MY FLOCKS AND UNTO THE WORD FOR I AM THE WORD! SO BE IT AND SELAH.
Go, Dharma, for these are painful moments and the attacks grow prickly and deeply hurtful. It is well, precious, for the work must be done. I bless ye of my beloved chelas for ye are my hands and feet, but I hold thee ones in mine wings. AU DA PAI DA CUM
I AM THE WAY; I AM THE WORD—I AM SANANDA GROWN TO BE ONE WITH OUR FATHER/MOTHER CREATOR AND HUMBLE SERVANT UNTO THE LAWS OF CREATION. I AM THY BROTHER COME TO BRING YOU HOME.
ADONAI, ESU SANANDA